Controlled Streams from Mean Beams

The 58th Annual Meeting of the American Physical Society’s Division of Plasma Physics (APS-DPP) is underway and I made it into my first press release! The conference sets up a Virtual Pressroom to distribute press releases about some of the really cool results that will be presented during the conference. For example, you can read all about Alcator C-Mod’s record-breaking pressure achievement here (and on this very website, too). You can also read about a neutral beam engineering project conducted by General Atomics and the DIII-D tokamak that resulted in the world’s first demonstration of in-shot voltage control of beam injection in a tokamak (PDF, here, but I’ve also copied the press release below).

Changing the voltage of the neutral beams during plasma shots is a big deal because it might allow you to control a lot of different aspects of the plasma. Fundamentally, it’s difficult to change the ~90,000 V level of the beams because the behavior of the beam (i.e., whether or not it fires correctly) is drastically affected by this voltage level. A typical procedure is to set the voltage and condition the beam through repeated firing until it works reliable at that voltage. Beams have been variable voltage for a long time, but they have never been able to change to a different voltage while firing into the plasma. Our work resulted in a method by which multiple beam characteristics can be changed simultaneously so that as the voltage changes, the beam compensates to ensure reliable operation. That’s an impressive engineering result in its own right, which motivated my cheery quote in the release.

The next few years will show whether variable voltage beams can help us make much better plasmas, though initial indications are that this allows greater control over plasma conditions such as injected torque and power. The technical paper showing results from initial plasma experiments using these variable voltage beams is available here.

The APS announcement and a slightly different one filed by General Atomics (see PDF here) have even been picked up by a few websites. The ITER Newsline and Barcelona Supercomputing Center actually wrote unique pieces based on the General Atomics release, as did The Engineer (UK) with the APS version (yes, that’s me in the comments section).

I hope the release conveys that this was a team effort and that the intention is to spread this technology to other laboratories. I’m generally concerned about how easy it is for releases to spread the wrong message about fusion research. I do think we could have come up with a better title. Maybe, “Blowing Your Mind with Neutral Beams”?

Full APS 2016 Press Release

General Atomics Breakthrough Enables Greater Control of Fusion Energy

Precise control of massive particle-beam systems avoids troublesome electromagnetic wave in fusion plasma.

SAN JOSE, Calif.—Researchers working at the DIII-D National Fusion Facility at General Atomics (GA) have created an important new tool for controlling fusion plasmas that are hotter than the sun.

apspr2016-01

Figure 1. Massive Beam, Precise Control: Members of the DIII-D Neutral Beam Group in front of a beam housing for two of the eight beamlines. (Photo by General Atomics)

Energy and momentum in DIII-D’s magnetically contained plasma is delivered by large neutral-particle beams systems, and GA’s recent demonstration of precise control of injected power and torque is a first. Scientists are now able to pre- program these inputs over the duration of plasma discharges (called “shots”). GA led the development effort in collaboration with scientists from the University of California- Irvine and Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.

Previously, these inputs were tailored using on/off modulation of neutral beams, resulting in large perturbations, i.e. power swings. The new method allows separate and continuous specification of power and torque, including the important capability of maintaining a fixed injected power level while varying torque.

Changing the way this system operates is a significant effort, considering the size and complexity of each beam system; there are four truck-sized housings for eight total beams at DIII-D (Figure 1). The neutral beam system injects up to 20 megawatts of power, approximately the power used by 15,000 homes.

In the past, neutral beams have operated by accelerating ions through a high voltage (approximately 90,000 volts, compared to the 120 volts of a typical household power outlet) that is fixed in time, and then passing them through a chamber of dense gas where they neutralize and fly into the magnetized plasma. High acceleration voltage is necessary to maximize the velocity of the resulting neutral atom and beam heating power.

Experiments in recent years have shown that the velocity of the beam particles can produce or amplify electromagnetic plasma waves that kick those beam particles out of the plasma and into the walls of the tokamak. This presents a dilemma because high beam power is necessary to reach fusion temperatures, but the beam particle loss reduces the temperature and can lead to costly damage along the tokamak walls.

The solution is to vary the beam’s high voltage over time, thereby reducing beam particle losses due to plasma waves while maximizing input beam power. As the plasma is heated, the behavior of the plasma waves changes such that beam particles of different velocities interact with the waves. Now, the DIII-D neutral beams can be given pre- programmed voltage profiles that minimize wave-particle interactions. This keeps the beam particles in the plasma and allows the beam voltage to increase to higher levels that maximize the input heating power. An example of reduced plasma wave activity is shown in the plots below (Figure 2), where similar plasma conditions produce very different waves based on the time evolution of the beam voltage.

Figure 2: Turning off Troublesome Waves: Spectrograms of measured beam ion loss. Both plasma shots feature the same total beam power, but the shot shown on the right utilizes a beam voltage program that greatly reduces the amplitude of coherent plasma waves. Adapted from D.C. Pace, et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 014001 (2017).

Figure 2: Turning off Troublesome Waves: Spectrograms of measured beam ion loss. Both plasma shots feature the same total beam power, but the shot shown on the right utilizes a beam voltage program that greatly reduces the amplitude of coherent plasma waves. Adapted from D.C. Pace, et al., Nucl. Fusion 57, 014001 (2017).

“This project involved two years of engineers and physicists working hard to create something new, and it’s wonderful to see it working successfully on DIII-D,” said Dr. David Pace, a physicist who led the project for the GA Energy Group, “Now we get to focus on the next exciting step, which is demonstrating all the ways these variable voltage beams can improve magnetic fusion in machines across the world.”

Initial results will be presented by Tim Scoville, head of the Neutral Beam Group at DIII- D, at the annual meeting of the American Physical Society Division of Plasma Physics, Oct. 31 – Nov. 4. This work is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, at the DIII-D facility operated by GA.

Contact: J. T. Scoville, General Atomics, scoville@fusion.gat.com
Abstract: PP10.00079
Real-Time Variation of the Injected Neutral Beam Energy on the DIII-D Tokamak

Session PP10: Poster Session VI (MFE: Energetic Particles, Heating, Current Drive and Fusion System Design; MFE: DIII-D Tokamak; ICF/HED: Diagnostics, X-Ray Sources and WDM; Pure-ion, Pure Electron, Anti-Matter Plasma and Strongly Coupled)

Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Room: Exhibit Hall 1

Leave a Reply