July's Recommended Post: Diary of a Graduate Thesis Experiment
| National Academies Report on Plasma Physics Finds there is Plenty of Work to Do |
| Saturday, 26 January 2008 | |||||||
|
The National Research Council (part of the National Academies) recently released its report on the present state and future of plasma physics in the United States. The report, or book, is titled, "Plasma Science: Advancing Knowledge in the National Interest" and can be purchased in paperback or PDF from their publishing website. It can also be read online for free (though this is labeled a "skim", I did not run into any limits on page views). The official widget for this report is included below.
Highlight: Plasma Physics is Still Full of OpportunityOverall, the report finds that the field of plasma physics is growing and there are many opportunities for future research. These future opportunities extend beyond the more commonly known fusion and astrophysics research programs. Industrial applications of plasmas are maturing and a wealth of unsolved problems is coming to light. Worth ReadingThere are some items in the report that are particularly interesting.
No government agency is bound by the suggestions of the committee, but it is obvious that if this report had determined plasma physics was a worthless field, then plenty of research projects and jobs might have been cut. People working in plasma physics might know there is a lot of work still to do, but that information needs to be spread to the policy makers. As a government advisor on science matters, the National Academies will present these findings to multiple levels of the U.S. government. Relevance to the Recent ITER BusinessThe recent ITER business is the cutting of ITER money by the US Congress. The Plasma Science report provides some notes that fit with an item I wrote about ITER recently. Chapter Four is dedicated to magnetically confined fusion research, which is naturally dominated by the role of ITER. In one of its summary conclusions the report states, Participation in ITER remains the most effective path for accomplishing the U.S. objective
of studying a fusion burning plasma.
and then it goes on to claim that the U.S. does not have a clear plan for the future of fusion research. Cutting out our contribution to the ITER project fits in with not having an eye toward the future. ConclusionIf you have any interest in studying physics, then take a few minutes to look through this report. The committee's recommendations for future work are likely to have an impact and this might very well indicate which areas will have resources over the next decade. This is also a good read for anyone interested in plasma physics because it provides an overview of the state of plasma research in the United States, complete with many results (i.e., fancy graphs and other visualizations) from research groups across the globe. Discuss this Item (opens forum in a new window, registration is not required) Tags: plasma physics, ITER |
|||||||
| Last Updated ( Friday, 06 June 2008 ) | |||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|

